This first line should start with "because" shouldn't it? And I tried
to do that, but the ensuing sentence was so long and involved that it
somewhat ran out of steam. Hence I chose to start it with that one --
the one up there.
The fact is I was left with no option other than to believe that she
isn't a human. Because if she is that aligns us is some way. Even if
it is just on a same-species level. But that fact is if I was to share
just that ground with her I'd have to destroy myself and the rest of
humanity because they too share that commonality.
You're being a bit histrionic there Oli you're no doubt saying to
yourself, however I genuinely assure you I'm not. That is genuinely
how I feel. And let me tell you why.
Anna Richardson's TV shows: The Sex Education Show, The Sex Education
Show vs Porn and The Sex Education Show -- Am I Normal?
These three TV shows are the most warped, underhand exploitation of
sex and children that have ever been broadcast on British TV.
If you haven't seen them, essentially what happens is Anna shows kids
some infected cocks and naked men and women then asks them leading
questions to make them seem ignorant and judgemental.
For example in one instance she places five naked men in front of a
hall of school children and asks them to point out the gay one.
The kids diligently take punts on the most effeminate one or the
thinnest one or the one with the plucked eyebrows.
It isn't until one kids says, almost unwittingly, "they all look the
same," that she pounces.
"Thank you -- of course you can't tell if people are gay just by
looking at them." she announces triumphantly. Well why were fucking
asking them to you cow? To make them look stupid and ignorant? Because
it's got nothing to do with educating them. If you wanted to educate
them you'd explain that homosexuality is merely a sexual preference
and like any way of life comes with a culture of its own that some
people choose to buy into more than others. The fact is actually, with
some gay men, you very much can tell they're gay and they want you to
be able to.
Go on Anna why not teach them about homosexuality? Teach them about
the way the government still doesn't give married gay couples the same
tax-breaks as a married heterosexual couple? And teach them about
Stonewall and section 28? Surely if they're old enough to see an
infected cervix they can handle it. Oh wait no, you're not going to
because actually all you're interested in doing is making a piece of
sensationalist TV for tutting, holier-than-thou, organic munching,
third sector, 30-something, pseudo-professionals to feel superior to.
It gets worse in her basement brow muff-fest The Sex Education Show vs
Porn she claimed to have reached a child porn site after just 10
minutes of clicking on pop-ups from mainstream porn sites.
This is patently lies. As a man, a man with access to the Internet, I
have, I'll admit, seen my fair share of porn. And in all my years, my
cumulative hours of horny surfing, I have never been guided to even
one "inappropriate site" and neither have any of my male friends.
That she made this clearly fraudulent claim explicitly to align legal,
consensual, erotic porn, the kind your parents watch, the kind your
nextdoor neighbour watches, the kind your boss, your dentist, your
pharmacist, your fucking yoga instructor watches, with something so
morally abhorrent as child-porn shows how warped and puritanical this
woman is.
Anna Richardson is part of the "campaign-celebrity" culture. A
movement that dictates every celebrity post Jamie Oliver's school
dinners must have a campaign. It probably serves as a way to fill the
gap in their self-esteem between the fame they've accrued and the
talent they actually have.
The fact is that sex, in most circumstances, even the kinky ones, is
sanitary. No matter how much we want to pretend otherwise. Anna
Richardson's attempt so sanitise sex actually has the opposite affect
as it alienates all those people who come to sex via other means than
her textbook, despotic, dictatorial, prescriptive outlook.
I myself lost my virginity at an early age. An age she'd call heinous
and disgusting, but the fact is it's just sex. I was safe and now I
have, what I would consider, a very healthy attitude to sex.
What she she fails to see, so profoundly, is that like anything in
life, sex means different things to different people. And she can't
handle that. In fact she hates it. She hates it because secretly she
hates sex and the transgressive, subversive, sexy stuff she thinks it
stands for but actually it doesn't.
